Morning Brief
The few control points that deserve attention, prepared from current delivery evidence.
Most project tools give the team another place to maintain. Tassqi gives the project manager a control plane, then asks everyone else for only the next decision they actually owe.
The mechanism is simple: Every dated task commitment is a promise. When it is not kept, its owner must choose what happens next and give a reason. That loop is enforced by the product.
No answer? By default, Tassqi escalates through the ownership chain after 2 days.
"The board says on track. The client says late."
Tassqi shows broken commitments from real decisions — not a manually colored status.
"I asked three times. Who owns the next move?"
One owner receives one clear question. Silence follows a visible escalation path.
"Why do we keep moving the same dates?"
Reasons are captured when the decision happens, so recurring delivery problems become measurable.
Board, list and timeline are views. The product underneath is a non-optional mechanism that protects three conditions every project manager depends on:
Every task, project and milestone has exactly one accountable owner. Absence has a deputy. Departure has an escalation path. The state "nobody" does not exist.
When a dated task commitment reaches its deadline, its owner must choose: done, a new date with a reason, or dropped with a reason. No answer becomes an escalation, not a hidden delay.
Silent work is surfaced automatically. Project health is computed from commitments, decisions and activity, so an abandoned plan cannot continue to look healthy.
Who owes what? What threatens delivery today? Which promises moved, and why? Where has an owner gone silent? Tassqi captures the evidence at the moment of decision, so the cockpit and every status report are built from behavior — not from manually maintained traffic lights.
Tass reads the Project facts already inside Tassqi and turns them into a focused answer. It cannot invent a source, edit a task, move a date, or make the decision for you.
The few control points that deserve attention, prepared from current delivery evidence.
Ask what is at risk, where you are waiting, or what changed, then open the exact frozen sources.
Describe the outcome, review the proposed structure, and confirm only what should become real work.
The project manager gets the cockpit: commitments owed, risks, silence, decision history and delivery reliability. Contributors see the next accountable action, not a dashboard they must keep alive. A guided first-project setup captures the outcome and first real commitment, while the in-product Help Center explains the workflow when someone needs it. Board, list, timeline, milestones, calendar, CSV, API and webhooks remain available when the PM needs them. The beta exposes only capabilities that are actually enabled.
Free beta
Free beta access
Use the current PM control plane and help shape the launch terms. No unimplemented plan limits are advertised.
No public member limit, AI allowance or paid-plan entitlement is promised until it is enforced in the product and published in the final terms.
"Will my team feel policed?"
Tassqi removes status theatre instead of adding it. It asks only when a commitment truly needs a decision, closes resolved questions automatically and never asks for a reason when a promise was kept.
"Another tool to roll out?"
The team maintains owned work once. Tassqi carries the follow-up, escalation and reporting evidence from there. Guided setup starts with one outcome and one real commitment, not a configuration project.
Bring your current project by CSV.